Next: About this document ...
Up: The `How and Why'
Previous: Outlook
- 1
- N. Austern, Direct Nuclear Reaction Theories. John Wiley, New York, 1970.
- 2
- G.R. Satchler, Direct Nuclear Reactions. OUP, Oxford, 1983.
- 3
- T. Aumann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 35
- 4
- V. Maddalena et al., Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 024613
- 5
- B. Elbeck and O. Tjørn, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 3
(1969) 259
- 6
- A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, World
Scientific, Singapore, 1998.
- 7
- W.N. Catford et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 247
(1986) 367
- 8
- L. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1968)
- 9
- J. Cizewski, Rutgers University, ORNL proposal (2000)
- 10
- J.S. Winfield et al.,
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 396 (1997) 147
- 11
- J.C. Hardy, Chalk River preprint TASCC-P-93-7 (1993)
unpublished.
- 12
- H. Lenske and G. Schrieder, Eur. Phys. J A 2 (1998) 41
- 13
- W.N. Catford, Proceedings of RNB2000, the Fifth Int. Conf. on
Radioactive Nuclear Beams, Divonne, France (2000), Nucl. Phys. A,
in press.
- 14
- S. Fortier, Proceedings of ENS 2000, Debrecen (2000), IPNO-DR 00-24
- 15
- W.N. Catford, J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1377
- 16
- K.E. Rehm et al., Phys. Rev. C 80 (1998) 676
- 17
- S. Fortier et al., Phys. Lett. B 461 (1999) 22
- 18
- J.S. Winfield et al., Nucl. Phys. A 683 (2001) 48
- 19
- S. Pita, thèse, Université de Paris (Orsay), 2000.
- 20
- C. Gund et al., European Phys. J. A, in press.
- 21
- N.K. Timofeyuk and R.C. Johnson, Phys. Rev.
C 59 (1999) 1545
- 22
- Y. Blumenfeld et al.,
Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 421 (1999) 471
- 23
- TIARA proposal, W.N. Catford et al.,
Surrey-Paisley-Daresbury-Birmingham-York collaboration (UK).
Wilton Catford
2001-02-15